Phillip Jordan vs Elijah Sanogo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 11:41 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Jordan vs E. Sanogo

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jordan 1 - 0 Sanogo
They have played 3 sets in total, with Phillip Jordan winning 2 and Elijah Sanogo winning 1. The last match between Phillip Jordan and Elijah Sanogo was at the M15 Villers-les-Nancy, 13-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Phillip Jordan getting the victory 6-1 6-7(4) 10-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jordan | 1 |
| Sanogo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Villers-les-Nancy(10-13-25)
P. Jordan vs E. Sanogo H2H Profile
P. Jordan vs E. Sanogo Match Preview:
- How do they perform on their second serves? Phillip Jordan slightly edges Elijah Sanogo with a 40.98% win rate compared to Sanogo's 40.80%. This statistic often indicates match outcomes.
- Who excels in return games? Jordan has the advantage, securing 44.61% of points on his opponents' second serves against Sanogo's 42.57%. For first serve returns, Jordan also leads with 31.21%, compared to Sanogo's 26.10%.
- Under pressure, when does each player thrive? Sanogo shows better resilience, having saved 58.62% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Jordan's 46.21%.
- Reflect on their overall match performance over the past year: Jordan has been more consistent and successful, winning 55.88% of his matches compared to Sanogo's 28.57%.
- Which surface brings out the best in them? Surprisingly, both players perform best on indoor hard courts with a 63% win rate. However, Sanogo struggles on hard courts, with no wins so far.
- Considering the level of competition they face, Jordan has faced lower-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 248.38, while Sanogo's opponents averaged a rank of 98.43.
- If forced into a deciding set, who is more likely to prevail? Jordan wins 38% of deciding sets, whereas Sanogo has yet to win any in similar situations this past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance statistics, Phillip Jordan proves to be more consistent in crucial areas such as returning serve and winning a higher percentage of matches in the past year. His ability to handle various surfaces with a modest level of success further enhances his overall competency on the court.
Elijah Sanogo, on the other hand, has shown strength under pressure, reflected in his higher breakpoint save percentage. However, his limited success in matches, evidenced by a lower win percentage and no victories in deciding sets, poses a concern for his potential to win consistently. Additionally, the challenging opponents he has faced might have impeded his ability to rack up wins.
Considering all these factors, despite the tighter competition when measured by opponent levels, Phillip Jordan's consistent performance and slight edge in crucial areas suggest that he is more likely to secure the victory in this upcoming tennis match.
Phillip Jordan vs Elijah Sanogo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Jordan vs E. Sanogo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 22 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:45:13 | Average Match Time | 1:45:13 |
| 77% (47/61) | 1st Serve % | 69% (54/78) |
| 77% (36/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (34/54) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 44% (34/78) | Return Points Win % | 28% (17/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Jordan Recent Matches Played
E. Sanogo Recent Matches Played

P. Jordan vs E. Sanogo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.11% (55/35) | YTD Win/Loss | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 61.81% (123/76) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 55.21% (1039/843) | Games Win/Loss | 43.03% (105/139) |
| 63.33% (38/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.87% (14/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 111 | Aces Total | 26 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 117 | Total Double Faults | 26 |
| 1:10:7 | Average Match Time | 1:37:32 |
| 218.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 76.22 |
| 64% (2347/3642) | 1st Serve % | 57% (357/623) |
| 63% (1478/2347) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (241/357) |
| 53% (688/1295) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (122/266) |
| 41% (193/473) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (18/51) |
| 43% (1734/4023) | Return Points Win % | 35% (182/527) |
| 61.11% (55/35) | Futures W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 62% (55/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 22% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (17/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 37% (7/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/5) |
| 91% (57/52) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 9% (57/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 9% (33/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (5/0) |